Whereas; Affidavits must contain the following: 1) A matter must be expressed to be resolved. 2) In Commerce Truth is Sovereignty 3) Truth is express in the form of an Affidavit 4) An un-rebutted Affidavit stands as truth in Commerce 5) an un-rebutted affidavit becomes the judgment in commerce

An Affidavit unrebutted stands as Truth.

affidavit uncontested unrebutted unanswered [United States v. Kis, 658 F.2d 526, 536 (7th Cir. 1981); Cert. Denied, 50 U.S. L. W. 2169; S. Ct. March 22, 1982 1982]

“Allegations in affidavit in support of motion must be considered as true in absence of counter-affidavit.” [Group v Finletter, 108 F. Supp. 327 Federal case of Group v Finletter, 108 F. Supp. 327]

“Indeed, no more than affidavits is necessary to make the prima facie case.” [United States v. Kis, 658 F.2d 526, 536 (7th Cir. 1981); Cert. Denied, 50 U.S. L. W. 2169; S. Ct. March 22, 1982]

AFFIDAVIT. A written or printed declaration or statement of facts, made voluntarily, and confirmed by the oath or affirmation of the party making it, taken before an officer having authority to administer such oath. Cox v. Stern, 170 Ill. 442, 48 N.E. 906, 62 Am.St.Rep. 385; Hays v. Loomis, 84 Ill. 18. A statement or declaration reduced to writing, and sworn to or affirmed before some officer who has authority to administer an oath or affirmation. Shelton v. Berry, 19 Tex. 154, 70 Am.Dec. 326, and In re Breidt, 84 N.J.Eq. 222, 94 A. 214, 216.affidavit uncontested unrebutted unanswered – [United States v. Kis, 658 F.2d 526, 536 (7th Cir. 1981); Cert. Denied, 50 U.S. L. W. 2169; S. Ct. March 22, 1982 1982] “Indeed, no more than affidavits is necessary to make the prima facie case.” [United States v. Kis, 658 F.2d 526, 536 (7th Cir. 1981); Cert. Denied, 50 U.S. L. W. 2169; S. Ct. March 22, 1982]
An affidavit uncontested unrebutted unanswered Morris v National Cash Register, 44 S.W. 2d 433 Morris v National Cash Register, 44 S.W. 2d 433, clearly states at point #4 that “uncontested allegations in affidavit must be accepted as true.”

An affidavit uncontested unrebutted unanswered Morris vs. NCR, 44 SW2d 433 Morris v National Cash Register, 44 SW2d 433: “An Affidavit if not contested in a timely manner is considered undisputed facts as a matter of law.”

Non Rebutted Affidavits are “Prima Facie Evidence in the Case,– “United States vs. Kis, 658 F.2d, 526, 536-337 (7th Cir. 1981);

“Indeed, no more than (Affidavits) is necessary to make the Prima Facie Case.” — Cert Denied, 50 U.S. L.W. 2169; S.Ct. March 22, 1982.

“Uncontested Affidavit taken as true in support of Summary Judgment.” — Seitzer v. Seitzer, 80 Cal. Rptr. 688

“Uncontested Affidavit taken as true in Opposition of Summary Judgment.” — Melorich Builders v. The SUPERIOR COURT of San Bernardino County (Serbia) 207 Cal.Rptr. 47 (Cal.App.4 Dist. 1984)

“Silence can only be equated with fraud where there is a legal or moral duty to speak, or where an inquiry left unanswered would be intentionally misleading. . . We cannot condone this shocking behavior… This sort of deception will not be tolerated and if this is routine it should be corrected immediately.” — U.S. v. Tweel, 550 F.2d 297, 299. (5th Cir. 1977) See also U.S. v. Prudden, 424 F.2d 1021, 1032, 1033 (5th Cir. 1977); Carmine v. Bowen, 64 A. 932 (1906)

The legislative branch of government does NOT have the Constitutional Power to issue Court Orders or any other kind of Orders to people, as a fiction court or a court/corporation for profit and gain cannot reach parity with a lawful man. ONLY presidents and governors have the Constitutional Power to grant PARDONS, but lawyers and lawyer-judges are unconstitutionally granting PARDONS with “immunity from prosecution.” Citizens are not permitted to act like people in the courts. The Citizen (2nd class) is told that he does not know how to fill out fancy lawyer forms; that he is not trained in the law; that he does not know court rules and procedures; etc. This is unconstitutional “lawyer system” only HEARSAY SUBSTITUTES (lawyers) NOT under oath, have access to the fiction/for profit and gain courts, even though ONLY sworn testimony and evidence can be presented in court. Anything else is Bill of Attainder, NOT permitted under the U.S. Constitution Article 1, Sections 9 and 10. The U.S. Constitution does NOT give anyone the right to a lawyer or the right to counsel, or the right to any other HEARSAY SUBSTITUTE. The 6th Amendment is very SPECIFIC, that the accused ONLY has the right to the ASSISTANCE of counsel and this ASSISTANCE of counsel CAN BE ANYONE THE ACCUSED CHOOSES WITHOUT LIMITATION.

NO COP CAN DRAG U INTO JURISDICTRION “No officer can acquire jurisdiction by deciding he has it. The officer, whether judicial or ministerial, decides at his own peril.” Middleton v. Low (1866), 30 C. 596, citing Prosser v. Secor (1849), 5 Barb.(N.Y) 607, 608. “The innocent individual who is harmed by an abuse of governmental authority is assured that he will be compensated for his injury.” Owens v. City of Independence, 100 S.Ct 1398 (1980) ” …If one individual does not possess such a right over the conduct of another [Good and Lawful Christian Man], no number of individuals [in a deliberative body] can possess such a right. All combinations, therefore, to effect such an object, are injurious, not only to the individuals particularly oppressed, but to the public at large”. People v. Fisher, 14Wend.(N.Y.) 9, 28 Am.Dec. 501


The resulting film exposes the efforts of Israel and its lobbyists to spy on, smear and intimidate US citizens and College Students who are waking up to the Jewish Conspiracy destroying the world, especially BDS Movement – the boycott, divestment and sanctions against Israel.

This four part film proves that Israel’s semi-covert black-ops government agency, the Ministry of Strategic Affairs, is operating this effort in collusion with an extensive network of Treasonous US Citizen that are “JEWISH” and have organizations in America few have heard of.
These include the Israel on Campus Coalition, The Israel Project and the Foundation for Defense of Democracies .

The film was suppressed world wide after the government of Qatar came under intense pressure not to release it – ironically from the very same Jewish lobby whose influence and Criminal acts the film exposes.

Clayton Swisher,  head of investigations, revealed in an article for The Forward in March sent more than 70 letters to individuals and organizations who appear in the film, providing them with an opportunity to respond. Only three did so. Instead, pro-Israel groups went on a campaign of slander and blackmail.

Part 1

Part 2

Part 3

Part 4

The film also reveals that US-based groups coordinate their efforts directly with the Israeli government, particularly its Ministry of Strategic Affairs.

Run by a former military intelligence officer, the ministry is in charge of Israel’s global campaign of covert sabotage targeting the BDS. The film shows footage of the very same ex-military intelligence officer, Sima Vaknin-Gil, claiming to have mapped Anti-semitism activist “globally. Everything from websites, University campuses, labor unions and churches.”

She promises to use this data for “offense activity” against Anyone awake to the Zionist / JEW. While they also continue their Talmudic plot on the dumb Goyim as well.

Jacob Baime, executive director of the Israel on Campus Coalition, claims in the undercover footage that his organization uses “corporate level, enterprise-grade social media intelligence software” to gather lists of Anti-Zionist activist related student events on University campuses, “generally within about 30 seconds or less” of them being posted online.


The Blood Libel Thirst Of Dr. Len Horowitz

Dr. Leonard Horowitz is a jewish Kabala Witch Doctor that claims he graduated from Harvard. He got his claim to fame by writing a book that was meant to mislead people about the HIV virus. He claims that the HIV virus was made by the U.S. government, when the truth is, the HIV virus does not even exist. Proof Here.
Here is a short clip of the Len Horowitz shtick…


Sherri (DOMINATRIX) Kane’s Extortion Of The Blood Libel Thirst Of Dr. Len Horowitz (4 Tha Lulz Version)

Dr. Len Horowitz BDSM Blood Libel Lust Exposed

Which Jews Are The Good Jews?

If you think talking about this Racist Cult is hateful, come on my radio program, lets talk about it.
I know, It’s not going to happen, but the facts speak for themselves, and you would love to stop the facts from being shared among the Goyim.